|
|
|
|
|
2. The Object of Study: "Quibbling" under Storyspace "Storyspace," a hypertext
platform like "Guide" or "HyperCard," was developed
expressly to offer software for writing, for composition,
for organizing ideas. My own attempts at writing with
"Storyspace" are not sufficient for a valid assessment of
whether this platform will truly support writing as a
process analogous to thinking. There may be something to it,
as the development was helped by, among others, a veritable
author (Michael Joyce), a theoretician of writing (David J.
Bolter), and a computer scientist (John B. Smith). As the
software is to support writing, not text layout,
"Storyspace" largely functions without typography;
incidentally, it is available for the Macintosh and Windows
operating systems. In contrast to the "folding
mechanism" of "Guide" and the "card and stacking mechanism"
of "HyperCard," "Storyspace" may be compared to a nesting
principle similar to that incorporated in Russian dolls:
"Storyspace" contains a basic unit, "writing space," which
is made up of two parts, i.e. a text field and a space in
which more "boxes," as we will call them below, can be
generated. This mechanism needs to be understood because it
is important to the structure of "Quibbling" and for finding
ones way in it. Figure 1: Two levels from
"Quibbling" Figure 1 shows only two
levels, first the "lake," "moon," and "prairie" parts
located below the title, and then those in
"moon." - "Lake" is a small
compartment with a sequence told in a relatively straight
way. Its beginning is a scene in which Heta gives Priam a
cigar box; the other boxes tell what she collected at the
shore of Lake Michigan. - "Prairie" (on the right in
the diagram) is a writing space with highly condensed and
sparse texts, in a way corresponding to the landscape.
- "Moon" is the main
section. By double clicking on the writing space we reach
the next level (indicated by the arrow), at which the four
men, Jacob, Will, Priam, and Cy, are placed opposite three
probably more extensive boxes ("mothers," "nun," and
"arcs"). This contrast is not only an impression gained of
the reader and viewer; the arrangement corresponds to the
author's intention, as she explains in "arcs," which also
contains some editing comments. The writing space of a topic
only shows the boxes of the next level. It could be that
clicking into the space at "Priam" would reveal the boxes
visible there, but would not indicate any further breakdown
in depth. In actual fact, however, we can go through
"cellaress" (a story in the story about "Margret &
Henry") on to "Priam writes," a kind of diary about the
effort of writing this story; then we could go on to
"untitled" with two boxes, one of them on "Dimitra," and
then on to "Catherine." Only her text field reveals that
Priam lives with Catherine who, in turn, has a close
relationship with Emma whose daughter Dimitra (as we learn
in the text in "Dimitra") reminds Catherine of her own
daughter whom she had given up for adoption as a
baby. This structuring pattern has
consequences which will have to be covered in greater detail
under the heading of "findings," and which can only be
alluded to at this point: One must have read relatively
much, gone over certain passages with very great attention,
observed the hints hidden there and filed them away in one's
memory "for further reference," if one wants to place this
network of relationships opening up with "Catherine" into
the proper place of the reconstruction of the story up to
this point. This also reveals the type of fragmentation and
the narrative structure. The entire story is subdivided into
a great many boxes arranged more or less consistently by
topics and "interlinked." The total scope is indicated to
amount to 662 writing spaces, 1064 links, and 352 KB of
data. The arrangement of the
pieces of the narration, and the possibilities for
navigation attached to the "reader version," result in three
or four, respectively, fundamental ways of reading this
hypertext: All three or four ways of
reading are offered by the "object," and by accepting these
valencies as requests to start exploring, we already talk
about "tasks." Actually, all these modes of reading were
tested. But the reading task by far exceeds merely trying
these modes of reading. |